|

Water and Walls
The number of possible moisture sources reaching your siding are endless. How about that lawn sprinkler that wets down this brick wall twice a week when no one is awake? Or consider the reservoir created by a gutter that slopes the wrong way, then add a split solder joint that slowly drips water behind the cornice. DonÕt forget the power of rising damp either. Classic rising damp, the curse of solid-masonry houses in swampy regions, is liquid water that gets ÒwickedÓ up through old mortar or brick by capillary action.Is the brown paper on my fiberglass insulation a vapor retarder? No, itÕs kraft paper, basically the same material as paper grocery bags. ItÕs been added to batt insulation for years to simplify installation, but alone it doesnÕt do much of anything. In some products the kraft paper comes asphalt-impregnated and coated with foil, a facing that is intended to block the movement of moisture. The newest batt products on the market may have coatings that improve their vapor retardant qualities. It is important to read the labels and installation instructions carefully before you buy and use these products. Unfaced insulation, of course, will have no vapor retarder unless you add one.
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |

Insulation Q&As What you should know about materials and methods. By OHJ Staff
Many folks want to do the right thing by adding insulation to an old house. The beneÞts of insulation and its related materials (air and vapor retarders) are lower heating bills in the winter, cheaper air conditioning in the summer, and greater comfort year-round. Unfortunately, these products are nearly as numerous as the contradictory advice and moisture horror stories that surround them.
Each of the following questions represents a common concern about insulating materials in old houses Ñ many of them in the not-so-old category of early- and mid-20th century construction. Once you understand the principles outlined in the answers, youÕll have the basic tools for dealing with the speciÞc insulating conditions in your old house.
Answer: The oil embargoes of the 1970s sparked a rush to insulate buildings of every kind. Blown-in cellulose became a very popular material for old houses: it was quick and cheap to add, and it even covered its costs through reduced heating energy bills. Where this insulation was improperly installed, however, many of us are now paying the price for the paint failures, rotted sills, and frozen pipes it caused.
Blown-in cellulose is simply a shredded paper product. Its light, puffy particles can Þll hard-to-reach voids in the perimeter envelope of a building. This deÞnitely can improve the buildingÕs thermal insulation value. The problem is, air moves easily through this low-density stuff. As warm room air passes through the wall cavity in winter it becomes cooler. If this air has a high moisture vapor content, the water vapor will condense into a liquid, or freeze into frost, and start a vicious cycle of destruction. The condensation will wet the celluloseÑjust like that wet newspaper in the drivewayÑrendering it useless as insulation. Pretty soon the wood siding gets saturated and wonÕt hold paint. High moisture levels in the framing can even promote wood rot or attract wood-eating insects.
I recommend restricting the use of cellulose insulation to extra-dry locations, such as attics, where it can be readily removed if the need arises. DonÕt forget about any water pipes up there. TheyÕll freeze if they wind up on the cold side of newly installed insulation. They must be moved to a heated environment.
Question: What about blown-in fiberglass or vermiculite?
Answer: Like cellulose, these materials are great insulators. Better yet, they are not combustible. (Blown-in cellulose of the past was not always treated with Þre retardant!) Blown-in fiberglass is a very light and puffy matrix of glass Þbers that uses its high percentage of air space to do the work of insulating. Vermiculite (sometimes mistaken for asbestos) is a ßaky, natural rock expanded to a pebble-sized mix that insulates in a similar way. Both these materials will allow air to easily pass through them the same as cellulose. Thus, they too have the potential to become waterlogged in the event of condensation, but to a lesser extent.
Question: Which insulation is best for use in southern humid climates?
Answer: Insulation was first introduced in houses in northern climates where the temperature outdoors drops to minus 10 degrees F or lower. This extreme cold creates a large differential in temperature through a wall between indoors and outdoors. Down south, even when it is 100 degrees F or so outdoors, the differential temperature at a wall is only about half as much as up north, when the room temperature is about 70 degrees F.
With year-round air conditioning being the norm in a southern climate, my primary focus would be on controlling outdoor air inÞltration and its resulting cold-surface condensation. Mold growth is a constant threat as hot, moist outdoor air cools on contact with these surfaces.
Old wood-frame houses down south can attribute their longevity to lots of ventilation, which helps dry out wet surfaces rapidly. Given this, in an old house I would lean towards not using any insulation. Instead, I would reduce inÞltration to a minimum and use the air-conditioning primarily for its ability to dehumidify, thereby keeping the air as dry as possible.On the other hand, in newer construction the use of rigid insulation and outer coatings of stucco or Dryvit work very well. These coatings are excellent barriers to both moisture vapor and inÞltration, and the thermal performance of the rigid insulation is not reduced, if they should get wet.
Question: My walls are not insulated, but the paint on my siding is peeling. Why?
Answer: ItÕs not fair to always blame peeling paint on a poor insulation job. Moisture may indeed be the culprit, but something simpler could be the agent. RooÞng, ßashing, and gutter leaks often cause water to enter a wall cavity. Porous materials like plaster, low-Þred brick, lime mortar, and wood will absorb this water and retain it for several days or weeks. Such moisture can make for poor adhesion at the time of paint application, or it can push what was a good paint job off the house soon after the leak begins.
All these situations have the same solution: a Moisture Inventory. This is a visual inspection of the house using logic to identify and quantify unwanted sources of water (see box). Although moisture generated from a dirt ßoor basement has a long way to migrate, it can easily end up as condensation on the back of siding. Similarly, residential humidiÞers can be very damaging to an improperly insulated old house.
Start your inventory with a ladder and inspect the whole house from a ÒrainÕs eyeÓ perspective. Going a step further, simulate rain with a garden hose and ask a friend to keep a lookout inside the house. Inspections during an actual downpour are the best! Be sure to check for each of the Major Moisture Makers. If no leaks show up, you may well be the victim of a condensation problem.
| Major Moisture Makers | | SOURCE | ESTIMATED MOISTURE OUTPUT (pints) | Combustion exhaust (from incomplete exhaust of heating fossil fuels) | 0 to 6,720+/year | Combustion exhaust (from unvented kerosene heaters) | 7.6/gallons of kerosene burned | | Green firewood | 400-800/cord/6 months | Ground moisture migration (from earth crawlspace, etc.) | 0 to 105/day | | Humidifiers | 0 to 120+/day | | Plumbing leaks | Variable | | Rain or snowmelt penetration | Variable | | Adapted from Moisture Sources Associated with Potential Damage in Cold Climate Housing by William J. Angell and Wanda Olson, University of Minnesota. |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|